About Me

Name: Defend America
Email: guy.ratki@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Just a Stupid Investigation that Serves No Purpose

House Readies CIA Probe

CIA is asked to provide documents about secret proposal to kill Al Qaeda leaders, likely a precursor to full-blown probe
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

House Republicans Offer a Health Care Plan

Republicans plan rival healthcare plan

Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:51am EDT
 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pushing back against Democratic plans to overhaul the U.S. healthcare system, Republicans on Tuesday readied a less costly alternative they say will make insurance more affordable.

Representative David Camp, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, said the plan offered significant reforms, including incentives for healthy living, protection for doctors against malpractice lawsuits and tax breaks to encourage small businesses to offer insurance to their workers.

http://www.reuters.com/article/gc07/idUSTRE56C2W720090713
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our History and God Being Targeted Once Again

'In God We Trust' Sparks Debate

Atheists, agnostics sue to block architect from engraving 'In God We Trust,' Pledge at Capitol Visitor Center
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Law Professor Disgusted by Sotomayor's Testimony Today

From Ed Whelan at The Corner blog on National Review Online:

In an online debate on the Federalist Society’s website, Georgetown law professor Mike Seidman writes:

 

I was completely disgusted by Judge Sotomayor's testimony today. If she was not perjuring herself, she is intellectually unqualified to be on the Supreme Court. If she was perjuring herself, she is morally unqualified. How could someone who has been on the bench for seventeen years possibly believe that judging in hard cases involves no more than applying the law to the facts? …

 

Perhaps Justice Sotomayor should be excused because our official ideology about judging is so degraded that she would sacrifice a position on the Supreme Court if she told the truth. Legal academics who defend what she did today have no such excuse. They should be ashamed of themselves.



http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjQ5YzgwNDNhOTI1YzlmZjkyMjYwMDNmOTIwM2U4M2Q=





Tags: sotomayor  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RNC Targets Sotomayor

Tags: sotomayor  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RNC Releases Ad on Stimulus and Obama

Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sotomayor Today

So two things that struck me today about Sotomayor today and they are that a. she disagrees (at least that's what she says) with Obama's definition of judges that he would appoint and b. she completely reversed herself on her "wise Latina" comment and all of her old statements. On the statement that she disagrees with Obama, the GOP should press her harder on that. Charles Krauthammer said basically that today on "Special Report w/ Bret Baier." All the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee say that they approve of Obama's definition of judges he would appoint, yet Sotomayor doesn't agree with the Democrats and Obama. That could be a very interesting question and answer tomorrow or in the remaining time if any Republican Senator poses that question to her, but for some reason I doubt that that question will be asked.

As for her disavowing all her past statements and claiming that she misstated or she didn't really mean to say that in that way, Senator Graham was right by saying that she shouldn't become a speech writer, if her law career doesn't work out. Those statements were spoken by Sotomayor on many occasions. I think the count is between 5 and 7 times she said those words. She obviously meant those words then, so why change now. It is obvious that she wants the public to believe that she believes justice should be applied blindly. But, anybody watching the hearings can decipher otherwise. I could go on and on about what she said today or didn't say (majority of the time she didn't say much), but it wouldn't do any good because as I pointed out and for those who might have watched today, everything that could have been said I think has been said. I could go over her entire testimony today, but as I stated before nothing was really answered so the American people can get better understanding of who she really is. I think we learned more that Senators like baseball a lot and that Senator Leahy likes the Red Sox, while Senator Schumer and Sotomayor like the Yankees.

Tags: sotomayor  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thomas Sowell and Michael Jordan

A Personal Inequity
by Thomas Sowell

Sometimes, when I hear about "disparities" and "inequities," I think of a disparity that applied directly to me-- the disparity in basketball ability between myself and Michael Jordan.

When I was in school, I was so awful in basketball that the class coach wouldn't even let me try out for softball, at which I was actually pretty good.

I was more than forty years old before I ever got the ball through the basket. It wasn't during a game. The basket was in my brother's backyard and I was just shooting-- unopposed-- from practically right under the basket. The only pressure on me was that my little nephew was watching.

After making that one basket, I never took a basketball in my hands again. I retired at my peak.

http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/07/14/a_personal_inequity


Tags: sowell  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chaos on Capitol Hill

Chaos on Capitol Hill: All Politics Is Loco
by Michael Barone

Disarray. That's one word to describe the status of the Obama administration's legislative program as Congress heads into its final four weeks of work before the August recess. A watered-down cap-and-trade bill passed the House narrowly last month, but Sen. Barbara Boxer has decided not to bring up her version in the upper chamber until September.

Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, who promised a health-care bill last month, still isn't delivering, and neither is the Health Committee's Christopher Dodd. They're both trying to nibble down cost estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, which has put the price tag at a trillion or more. But their latest ploys -- broad-based tax increases, transferring more of the Medicaid burden to the states -- sound like sputtering.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MichaelBarone/2009/07/14/chaos_on_capitol_hill_all_politics_is_loco


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Criticisms of Bush that are Better Applied to Obama

Five Criticisms of George Bush That Could Be Better Applied to Barack Obama
by John Hawkins

Most liberals in this country are intellectually dishonest which is why they don't have the slightest qualms about grotesque double standards. That's why Al Gore can live in a mansion that consumes energy like a football stadium while he tells you to cut back. It's why Sarah Palin can be sliced apart for things said by Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live while Joe Biden is treated seriously despite being the biggest doofus ever to occupy the Vice-Presidency. It's also why Barack Obama gets a free pass for many of the same things that George Bush was criticized for doing. Here are just a few of the criticisms aimed at George Bush that could be better applied to Barack Obama.

Barack Obama is a chickenhawk: How often did we hear liberals sneer that George Bush was a chickenhawk? How could someone who had never served in combat lead America as Commander-in-Chief?

Well, excuse me for noticing, but George Bush did at least fly planes for the National Guard. On the other hand, despite the fact that Barack Obama never served at all, he's fighting the same two wars that Bush did in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is even ramping things up in Afghanistan while simultaneously forcing our troops to engage in combat under onerous new rules of engagement that will make it much tougher on our soldiers. Guess it's easy for a chickenhawk like Obama to handcuff our troops going into battle when he has never been into combat himself.

http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2009/07/14/five_criticisms_of_george_bush_that_could_be_better_applied_to_barack_obama


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CBO Estimates Cost of House Health Care Bill

Document drop: CBO scores the health care takeover

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 14, 2009 04:33 PM

A Senate staffer passes along the CBO/Joint Committee on Taxation report scoring the House health care takeover.

Bottom line from the staffer:

$1.042 trillion over “ten years”, though the program really gets going in 2015 so its more like a 5 year score. Also, don’t forget most bills carve out unions so that they have a reprieve. Who needs card check [with] US government health insurance as a recruiting tool.

I’ve uploaded the full report: Read it here.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/document-drop-cbo-scores-the-health-care-takeover/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Contradictions Offered by Sonia Sotomayor

In regards to foreign law and the Constitution, as Andrew C. McCarthy points out, she contradicted herself:

Have a look at this passage from Collin Levy's excellent WSJ op-ed today on "Sotomayor and International Law." He is quoting from a speech Judge Sotomayor gave to the ACLU of Puerto Rico a few months back, in which she applauded resort to foreign law in U.S. constitutional cases:

In Roper [v. Simmons], the Court drew on international criticism of the death penalty to buttress the argument that it should be prohibited for juveniles under the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. In Lawrence v. Texas, the court overturned a Texas statute against sodomy on the grounds that it violated due process. In his opinion for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy cited the European Court of Human Rights to show that the court's earlier decision in Bowers v. Hardwick was incorrect. In both those cases, Judge Sotomayor said, the court was using the foreign or international law to "help us understand what the concepts meant to other countries and . . . whether our understanding of our own constitutional rights fell into the mainstream of human thinking." [Emphasis added.]

Now this is what she said today answering Senator Schumer's questions:

American law does not permit the use of foreign law or international law to interpret the Constitution. That's a given. And my speech explained that, as you noted, explicitly. There is no debate on that question; there's no issue about that question.

This from Ed Whelan at Bench Memo blog on National Review Online:

In regards to her position at the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, she said that fundraising was the primary responsibility of the organization.

But, the NY Times described her position as:

[PRLDEF’s litigation] efforts were backed by the defense fund’s board of directors, an active and passionate group that included a young lawyer named Sonia Sotomayor….

The board monitored all litigation undertaken by the fund’s lawyers, and a number of those lawyers said Ms. Sotomayor was an involved and ardent supporter of their various legal efforts during her time with the group.…

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/us/politics/29puerto.html?_r=1#34;may%2028=&_r=1&sq=hernandez%20sotomayor%20&st=cse&
Tags: sotomayor  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Sessions Questioning Sotomayor

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Graham Questioning Sotomayor

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »