Posted by
Defend America on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:18:17 AM
Four Colossal Holes in the Theory of Man-Made Global Warming
by John Hawkins
Repeating the words "scientific consensus" over and over and telling
sad stories about polar bears does not qualify as "science." So, why is
it that the people who insist that Man-made global warming is based on
science, not politics, always get shaky and defensive when people want
to actually talk about the reasoning behind it?
When was the last time you heard a scientist get hysterical when you
asked him to explain Einstein's theory of relativity? If you ask a
scientist why nothing can move faster than the speed of light, he
doesn't tell you a terrible story about how koala bears will die if you
don't believe the theory is right, does he? Scientists who are
confident and in command of the facts don't need to distort data and
duck basic questions about the assumptions that are behind scientific
theories.
So, why is it that the people who insist that man-made global warming
is occurring right now can't come up with coherent answers to many of
the most basic problems with the ideas that undergird their theory?
http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2009/12/08/four_colossal_holes_in_the_theory_of_man-made_global_warming