New errors in IPCC climate change report
The United Nations panel on climate change is facing fresh criticism today as The
Sunday Telegraph reveals new factual errors and poor sources of evidence
in its influential report to government leaders.
By Richard Gray and Ben Leach
Published: 9:00PM GMT 06 Feb 2010
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) report is supposed to
be the world’s most authoritative scientific account of the scale of global
warming.
But this paper has discovered a series of new flaws in it including:
The publication of inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce
electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the
website of a commercial wave-energy company.
Claims based on information in press releases and newsletters.
New examples of statements based on student dissertations, two of which were
unpublished.
More claims which were based on reports produced by environmental pressure
groups.
...
And on Friday, it emerged that the IPCC’s panel had wrongly reported that more
than half of the Netherlands was below sea level because it had failed to
check information supplied by a Dutch government agency.
Researchers insist the errors are minor and do not impact on the overall
conclusions about climate change.
However, senior scientists are now expressing concern at the way the IPCC
compiles its reports and have hit out at the panel’s use of so-called “grey
literature” — evidence from sources that have not been subjected to
scientific scrutiny.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7177230/New-errors-in-IPCC-climate-change-report.html