About Me

Name: Defend America
Email: guy.ratki@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Saul Alinsky Never Leaves the Obama Administration's Thinking for a Second and Now Rep. Paul Ryan is Experiencing Mr. Alinsky's Ideas

Obama's Attack Machine—II

The White House is deflecting questions about its ugly budget by hammering on Paul Ryan's plan.


'Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it," wrote Saul Alinksy in his "Rules for Radicals." The White House would appear to have a copy.

His agenda stymied and his approval numbers sinking, President Obama has realized this year's midterm election is shaping up as a referendum on failed Democratic governance. The new White House plan? Change the discussion, talk about Republicans, and frighten the nation about GOP ideas.

This is the way to read Mr. Obama's sudden re-embrace of his opposition—his unexpected appearance at the House Republican retreat, and his more recent invitation to Republicans to a "bipartisan" health-care summit. And it's the way to understand the recent Democratic targeting, freezing, personalizing and polarizing of Rep. Paul Ryan.

The idea-driven Wisconsin Republican first released his "Roadmap for America's Future" in 2008. The nation can argue about its particulars, but what is inarguable is that Mr. Ryan's plan is a real attempt to solve America's biggest problems, with bold tax, health and entitlement reforms to put the country back on the path to solvency.

At the time, Democrats could barely muster a yawn. So imagine the surprise when, after Mr. Ryan re-released his plan in late January, it became a sudden sensation. Two days later Mr. Obama used his visit to the Republican retreat to thrust it into the national spotlight. The cameras rolling, the president praised Mr. Ryan for putting forward a "serious proposal." He in fact singled out the congressman at least three times. Having done his spotlight bit, Mr. Obama then left it to the rest of the Democratic Party to systematically distort and trash the road map.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703382904575059573079680544.html


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Filibuster is Here to Stay'

Like it or not, the filibuster is here to stay

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
February 12, 2010

In November 2008, just days after Republicans suffered a thorough beating at the polls, former Sen. Fred Thompson spoke to a group of dispirited conservatives on a Caribbean cruise sponsored by National Review. He was asked if he had any advice for his old Republican colleagues in the Senate.

"They need to make sure they get this straight," Thompson deadpanned. "Up until now, filibusters have been a bad thing. Now, filibusters are a good thing."

Everybody laughed, but has anyone uttered a more succinct explanation for why the filibuster lives? Every member of the Senate knows that today's majority is tomorrow's minority, and for that reason most would never, ever, do away with the Senate's strongest protection of minority rights.

But today Democrats are raging against the filibuster, by which minority Republicans can require a 60-vote supermajority to pass some legislation. There are calls to change the Senate's rules to loosen the filibuster's hold, or even to eliminate it altogether.

Some Democrats are already predicting the demise of the filibuster. "I think it will either fall of its own weight -- it should fall of its own weight -- or it will fall after some massive conflict on the floor," Sen. Carl Levin recently told the Huffington Post.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Like-it-or-not_-the-filibuster-is-here-to-stay-84167287.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Requiem for a Corruptocrat'

John Murtha: Requiem for a Corruptocrat
by Michelle Malkin

We are not supposed to speak ill of the dead. But those whom the deceased viciously smeared and humiliated deserve to be defended. Entrenched Democratic Rep. John Murtha passed away on Feb. 8 after a botched gallbladder surgery. He has been hailed as a "military advocate" (Associated Press) and "one of the greatest patriots ever to serve in Congress" (former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford Jr.). These obsequious obituaries leave out inconvenient truths:

John "Jack" Murtha was an unrepentant smear merchant and corruptocrat to the bitter end.

In May 2006, during an MSNBC TV show appearance that Marines and their families will never forget or forgive, Murtha accused U.S. troops of wantonly killing some two dozen civilians, including children, in the terrorist stronghold of Haditha, Iraq. Bellowed Murtha: "Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood." Murtha publicly indicted the Marines before military investigations had been completed. His remarks opened military-bashing floodgates around the world.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2010/02/12/john_murtha_requiem_for_a_corruptocrat


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bipartisanship Means Advancing Obama's Socialist Agendas

Bipartisanship Equals Single-Payer-ship
by David Limbaugh

It's not a good idea for Republicans to accept President Barack Obama's invitation to a "bipartisan" health care summit, because it would not advance acceptable health care reform. The only thing it likely would advance would be Obama's propaganda message -- and, thus, his socialist agenda.

Everyone knows Obama wouldn't be considering such a move if the American people had not so resoundingly rejected Obamacare.

From the very beginning, he has approached this issue more as a dictator than one interested in hearing genuine input from the other side. Nor has he shown good faith, having broken his cynical promise to televise the debates on C-SPAN and having misrepresented his plan in a number of particulars.

When called on the C-SPAN pledge, he glibly replied that most of the process has been televised in regular sessions of Congress and committee hearings, knowing full well that's not what anyone understood him to mean when he made his promise.

http://townhall.com/columnists/DavidLimbaugh/2010/02/12/bipartisanship_equals_single-payer-ship


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »