About Me

Name: Defend America
Email: guy.ratki@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

House Passes Reconciliation Bill

The House passes the Reconciliation Bill 220-211.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

House Defeats Last Chance to Kill the Bill by Republicans

The vote to kill the bill was 199-222.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ObamaCare has Passed

ObamaCare has passed by a vote of 219-212. 34 Democrats voted no.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Final Vote on ObamaCare in the House has Begun

The final vote for passage on ObamaCare has now begun. After the vote, Republicans will have a motion to recommit and then they will include the Stupak language for abortion that passed in the House back in November.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More about the Worthless Executive Order

Via Bill Burck and Dana Perino:

Executive orders have the force of law only within the executive branch and only to the extent they are consistent with legislation.  Stupak believes that the Senate bill does not do enough to prohibit the use of federal funds; what he apparently does not realize is that the executive order can do no more to prohibit use of federal funds for abortion than the Senate bill does.  If there is any inconsistency between the executive order and the bill, the order gives way to the bill.  Moreover, as is typical of executive orders, this one explicitly says that it creates no right at law to sue the U.S. government if funds in fact are paid for abortions.  So, the executive order is a nullity.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzQ3NWIxYTE4NWJhM2UzY2YxOTMwNjMxZmE0ZjE2NjY=

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reconciliation Fight has Already Begun and the Senate Health Care Bill has Not Passed in the House Yet

Senate Fight Starts: GOP Says Senate Parliamentarian Will Kill Fix-Its Bill

March 21, 2010 5:01 PM

ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf reports: The House bill has not yet passed and already we are seeing the reconciliation fight start in the Senate.

Senate Republicans say they can get the whole package of reconciliation fixes – the fix-its that make the Senate plan palatable to House Democrats - thrown out with a trump card procedural motion. And they say Democrats are slow-walking a decision from the parliamentarian until the House passes the Senate bill. 

That means the Senate bill, which everyone in the House seems to universally hate, will be the law of the land.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/03/senate-fight-starts-gop-says-senate-parliamentarian-will-kill-fixits-bill.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Man Who Stood in the Way of Using the "Slaughter Option"

Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) said Saturday that he fought hard to oppose the controversial “deem and pass” procedure to pass health care reform because he wanted to avoid a potential judicial challenge to the measure.

“When the situation is so hot and there’s so many people that are so angry, that you need to have an abundance of caution, and abundance of care, to make sure we don’t get the situation where the Supreme Court is deciding this later,” he said Saturday evening as he left Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) office.

Cardoza announced earlier Saturday that he would vote “yes” on the bill.

But the Rules Committee member said he didn’t want to have a Bush v. Gore situation — referring to the controversial 2000 presidential election that ended in a Supreme Court decision — in which the nation’s high court would review the procedure of another government branch.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/44441-1.html?type=aggregate_friendly&CMP=OTC-RSS

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

House Republicans Still have a Chance to Kill the Bill If They Only Include Stupak's Abortion Language on Their Motion to Recommit and Don't Include Tort Reform and Other Ideas They Might Have

Democrats worried about Republicans' motion to recommit on Stupak language

By Jared Allen - 03/21/10 06:18 PM ET

Democrats are worried about holding their members together on a GOP motion that could kill the healthcare bill.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said House leaders are specifically concerned about a Republican motion to recommit that would contain only language on abortion that Stupak originally had wanted to include in the Senate bill.

The concern is based on the fear of GOP attack ads painting Democrats who vote against a motion to recommit that includes Stupak’s favored language on abortion as “flip-floppers” on the issue.

Sixty-eight Democrats voted for Stupak’s language in a November vote. They could be portrayed as flipping if they now voted against it.


“They are concerned about it,” Stupak said after his Sunday press conference. 

If enough Democrats with Republicans backed the motion to recommit the bill to committee, it would effectively kill the healthcare bill.

Democrats, however, said they expect the GOP motion will include other proposed changes to the bill, besides the Stupak language on abortion.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/88167-democrats-worry-gop-motion-could-stop-healthcare

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vote on Rules for Debate to Move Forward with General Debate Passes and that Means ObamaCare to Pass Shortly

It passes 224-206. 28 Democrats joined all the Republicans voting no. One Democrat did not vote. This means unless someone decides to change their vote on final passage ObamaCare will become law. Now general debate will occur and then later a vote for final passage of the Senate Health Care Bill and then "fixes" to that bill.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Procedural Vote to Move Forward to Vote on the Rules Passes

It passed by a vote of 228-201. Rep. Cao, the lone Republican who voted yes back in November on the bill, voted yes for a second, then decided to change his vote to a no. Now, the House is voting on the rules for debate. After passage of the rules for debate, general debate will follow and then vote on final passage later on tonight.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What the Executive Order Means

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz saying what the executive order means and the answer is nothing because the executive order does not change anything but keep the Hyde amendment intact, but that is useless because the Senate Health Care Bill overrides the Hyde amendment for abortion funding and the Hyde amendment only refers to annual Health and Human Services appropriations bill. Therefore, by Obama signing the executive order, nothing will have changed in the Senate bill.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Executive Order

EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

ENSURING ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ABORTION RESTRICTIONS IN THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (approved March ¬¬__, 2010), I hereby order as follows:

Section 1. Policy.

Following the recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the Act”), it is necessary to establish an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment. The purpose of this Executive Order is to establish a comprehensive, government-wide set of policies and procedures to achieve this goal and to make certain that all relevant actors—Federal officials, state officials (including insurance regulators) and health care providers—are aware of their responsibilities, new and old.

The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.

Numerous executive agencies have a role in ensuring that these restrictions are enforced, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Section 2. Strict Compliance with Prohibitions on Abortion Funding in Health Insurance Exchanges. The Act specifically prohibits the use of tax credits and cost-sharing reduction payments to pay for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) in the health insurance exchanges that will be operational in 2014. The Act also imposes strict payment and accounting requirements to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services in exchange plans (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) and requires state health insurance commissioners to ensure that exchange plan funds are segregated by insurance companies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, OMB funds management circulars, and accounting guidance provided by the Government Accountability Office.

I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act’s segregation requirements, established in Section 1303 of the Act, for enrollees receiving Federal financial assistance. The guidelines shall also offer technical information that states should follow to conduct independent regular audits of insurance companies that participate in the health insurance exchanges. In developing these model guidelines, the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS shall consult with executive agencies and offices that have relevant expertise in accounting principles, including, but not limited to, the Department of the Treasury, and with the Government Accountability Office. Upon completion of those model guidelines, the Secretary of HHS should promptly initiate a rulemaking to issue regulations, which will have the force of law, to interpret the Act’s segregation requirements, and shall provide guidance to state health insurance commissioners on how to comply with the model guidelines.

Section 3. Community Health Center Program.

The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program. Existing law prohibits these centers from using federal funds to provide abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), as a result of both the Hyde Amendment and longstanding regulations containing the Hyde language. Under the Act, the Hyde language shall apply to the authorization and appropriations of funds for Community Health Centers under section 10503 and all other relevant provisions. I hereby direct the Secretary of HHS to ensure that program administrators and recipients of Federal funds are aware of and comply with the limitations on abortion services imposed on CHCs by existing law. Such actions should include, but are not limited to, updating Grant Policy Statements that accompany CHC grants and issuing new interpretive rules.

Section 4. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this Executive Order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) authority granted by law or presidential directive to an agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This Executive Order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This Executive Order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person.

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/21/obama-executive-order-on-abortion-funding/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Believe it is Over

Stupak, Dems reach abortion deal; 'eight or nine' will now vote yes

By Jared Allen and Jeffrey Young - 03/21/10 03:33 PM ET

Democrats have reached a deal on an executive order on abortion that could hand them a victory on healthcare.

"Eight or nine" Democrats, including Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), will announce the deal at a 4 p.m. press conference, according to an anti-abortion Democrat.

"We've changed [our votes]," said Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-Ohio).

Driehaus said he's seen the executive order and can now vote for the healthcare bill.  He said Stupak has signed off, as well.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/88143-stupak-dems-reach-abortion-deal-eight-or-nine-will-vote-yes
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sorry I Could Not Post Since the Early Morning

I was traveling and unable to post since early morning. But, now I am back.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »