About Me

Name: Defend America
Email: guy.ratki@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Obama to Sign Meanignless Abortion Executive Order with No Cameras Present

Via Politico's Live Pulse:


Obama to sign abortion exec order in private

President Barack Obama will sign the executive order Wednesday that prohibits federal funding of abortion surrounded by members of Congress who oppose abortion rights -- but he won't do it for the cameras.

http://www.politico.com/livepulse/0310/Obama_to_sign_abortion_exec_order_in_private.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Your Medical Records aren't Secure'

Your Medical Records Aren't Secure

The president says electronic systems will reduce costs and improve quality, but they could undermine good care if people are afraid to confide in their doctors.


I learned about the lack of health privacy when I hung out my shingle as a psychiatrist. Patients asked if I could keep their records private if they paid for care themselves. They had lost jobs or reputations because what they said in the doctor's office didn't always stay in the doctor's office. That was 35 years ago, in the age of paper. In today's digital world the problem has only grown worse.

A patient's sensitive information should not be shared without his consent. But this is not the case now, as the country moves toward a system of electronic medical records.

In 2002, under President George W. Bush, the right of a patient to control his most sensitive personal data—from prescriptions to DNA—was eliminated by federal regulators implementing the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act. Those privacy notices you sign in doctors' offices do not actually give you any control over your personal data; they merely describe how the data will be used and disclosed.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703580904575132111888664060.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion


Tags: health care  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Bond Markets Reflect the True Cost of ObamaCare'

Bond markets reflect the true cost of Obamacare

By: Michael Barone
Senior Political Analyst
March 24, 2010

Not many people noticed amid the Democrats' struggle to jam their health care bill through the House, but in recent weeks United States Treasury bonds have lost their status as the world's safest investment.

The numbers are pretty clear. In February, Bloomberg News reports, Berkshire Hathaway sold two-year bonds with an interest rate lower than that on two-year Treasuries. A company run by a 79-year-old investor is a better credit risk, the markets are telling us, than the United States government.

Buffett's firm isn't the only one. Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson and Lowe's have been borrowing money at cheaper rates than Uncle Sam.

Democrats wary of voting for the health care bill may have been soothed by the Congressional Budget Office's report that it would reduce federal deficits over the next 10 years. But bond buyers know that the Democrats gamed the CBO system to get a good score.

The realities, as former CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin pointed out in the New York Times, are different. The real cost is disguised by the fact that the bill includes 10 years of revenue but only six years of spending. It includes $70 billion in premiums for long-term care that will have to be paid out later. It excludes $114 billion in discretionary spending needed to run the program. It includes nearly half a trillion dollars in unrealistic Medicare savings.

Holtz-Eakin's bottom line: The bill will not lower deficits but will raise them by $562 billion over 10 years. Treasury will have to borrow that money -- and probably pay much higher interest than it's paying now.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Bond-markets-reflect-the-true-cost-of-Obamacare-88952847.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Entitlement Rip-Off'

Entitlement Rip-Off
by John Stossel

Bernie Madoff took money from people who thought he'd invested it, gave some to others who thought it was a partial return on their earlier investments and kept much for himself. That's called a Ponzi scheme, and his $50 billion fraud was called the biggest ever. But it wasn't the biggest. Social Security and Medicare are much bigger ones.

These are trillion-dollar scams. Medicare has a $36 trillion unfunded liability. Social Security's is $8 trillion. There's no money to keep those promises.

But Congress isn't investigating this scam. Congress runs it. That FICA money you thought government had saved for your retirement is gone. There's nothing left but IOUs backed by nothing. Your money was spent not only on current retirees but on wars, welfare, corporate bailouts, earmarks and all the other stuff Congress wants. For years, this was possible because the FICA tax brought in surpluses that allowed government to pay retirees more than they contributed and still help buy those other things.

Those days are gone. The huge group of baby boomers has started to retire, and that means trouble. In 2008, for the first time, Medicare paid out more than it took in.

http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2010/03/24/entitlement_rip-off


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Reality of ObamaCare'

The Reality of Obamacare
by Jonah Goldberg

First: Congratulations to President Obama and the Democratic leadership. You won dirty against bipartisan opposition from both Congress and the majority of Americans. You've definitely polarized the country even more, and quite possibly bankrupted us, too. But hey, you won. Bubbly for everyone.

Simply, you have nationalized health care by proxy. Insurance companies are now heavily regulated government contractors. Way to get big business out of Washington and our lives! These giant corporations will clear a small, government-approved profit on top of their government-approved fees. Then, when health care costs rise -- and they will -- Democrats will insist, yet again, that the profit motive is to blame, and out from this ObamaCare Trojan horse will pour another army of liberals demanding a more honest version of single-payer.

The Obama administration has turned the insurance industry into the Blackwater of socialized medicine.

http://townhall.com/columnists/JonahGoldberg/2010/03/24/the_reality_of_obamacare

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'EU's Loss May be West's Gain'

BOLTON: EU's loss may be West's gain

Euro woes breathe new life into Atlantic alliance


European Union leaders will meet again this week on Greece's fiscal crisis and the ongoing financial turmoil it is causing. To most Americans, the EU's problems seem remote, given our own turmoil over President Obama's zeal to radically restructure the U.S. health care system. In fact, however, profound implications for trans-Atlantic relations over the long term lie just beneath the often-impenetrable EU financial jargon. Here's why:

Greece is just one of several countries, including Spain, Portugal and perhaps Italy, that have not adequately constrained government spending. As budget deficits escalated, financial markets questioned Greece's fiscal stability; if Greece still had a national currency, it would be under enormous pressure, reflecting market concern that increased debt or inflated currency would be used to fund the deficit.

Of course, since Greece joined the euro-zone, it no longer has its own currency to debase, and its lack of fiscal discipline has caused downward pressure on the euro instead. All euro-zone members are thereby immediately affected, thus escalating pressure particularly on Germany, the EU's dominant economy, to "do something" to prevent Greece's crisis from infecting the entire Union.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/23/eus-loss-may-be-wests-gain/


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'An Off-Budget Office?'

An Off-Budget Office?
by Thomas Sowell

Under the headline "Costly Bill Seen as Saving Money," the San Francisco Chronicle last week began a front-page story with these words: "Many people find it hard to understand how the health care legislation heading for a decisive vote Sunday can cost $940 billion and cut the horrendous federal deficit at the same time."

It's not hard to understand at all. It is a lie.

What makes this particular lie pass muster with many people, who might otherwise use their common sense, is that the Congressional Budget Office vouched for the consistency of the budget numbers that say you can add millions of people to a government-run system and yet save money.

The Congressional Budget Office does honest work. But it can only use the numbers that Congress supplies-- and Congress does dishonest work. It is not the CBO's job to give their opinion as to whether any of the marvelous things that Congress says it will do in the future are either likely or possible.

The Congressional Budget Office is like a computer: Garbage in, garbage out. The numbers in the health care bill are especially smelly garbage.

Do we really need a government agency to give us a false sense of security? Don't we already have politicians to do that? Weren't they doing that at the height of the housing boom that preceded the collapse, which then brought down the whole financial system and the whole economy? Many warnings were brushed aside by Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd and many others in Congress.

What we really need-- and will never get-- is a Congressional Off-Budget Office. This would be an agency that does not have to accept whatever numbers Congress sends them and pretend to take those numbers seriously.

http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2010/03/24/an_off-budget_office


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cheney Endorses Republican Senatorial Candidate for KY Trey Grayson

Cheney boosts Grayson on security


Former Vice President D*ck Cheney endorsed Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson for U.S. Senate Wednesday, intervening in a hotly contested Republican primary for the second time this year.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34935.html


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dan Senor will Not Run Against Gillibrand

Another potential Gillibrand challenger declines to run

By Aaron Blake - 03/24/10 12:09 PM ET

It's nice to have Chuck Schumer on your side.

Dan Senor became that latest politician to weigh a challenge to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), only to recoil when it came time to make a decision.

Senor, a former spokesman for the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, said it wasn't the right time.

"Over the past few weeks, I took a very serious look at running for the Senate seat in New York," he said in a statement. "I ultimately decided this wasn’t the right time in my family and business life for me to run."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/88811-senor-wont-run

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Five Dems Who Wish They had Last Week Back'

5 Dems Who Wish They Had Last Week Back

By Sean Trende

The final vote on Obamacare did not go as vote counters expected. There were no tears on the House floor, no arms being twisted, and no Jay Inslee guarding the door to prevent recalcitrant Democrats from escaping. Instead, the final vote was something of an anticlimax, passing with three votes to spare.

There were probably a number of wavering Democrats who were pressured into declaring their support of the bill early who wish they could do the past week over, knowing that their vote wasn't really needed in the end. These Democrats aren't necessarily the most likely to lose in 2010, they're just the ones who seemed to be wavering and who really would have liked to take a couple of those spare "nay" votes:

http://townhall.com/myblog/The%20final%20vote%20on%20Obamacare%20did%20not%20go%20as%20vote%20counters%20expected.%20There%20were%20no%20tears%20on%20the%20House%20floor,%20no%20arms%20being%20twisted,%20and%20no%20Jay%20Inslee%20guarding%20the%20door%20to%20prevent%20recalcitrant%20Democrats%20from%20escaping.%20Instead,%20the%20final%20vote%20was%20something%20of%20an%20anticlimax,%20passing%20with%20three%20votes%20to%20spare.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saudi Arabia Arrests Militants Planning Attacks

Saudi Arabia says arrests militants planning attacks

Source: Reuters
RIYADH, March 24 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter, has arrested scores of suspected militants accused of plotting attacks on vital installations including oil in the kingdom, Saudi media reported on Wednesday. They said the arrested militants included dozens of Saudis as well as a large number of foreigners.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE62N0TA.htm

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Forgot to Cover Children Who Have Preexisting Conditions

Gap in health care law's protection for children

WASHINGTON — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.

Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage.

Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.

However, if a child is accepted for coverage, or is already covered, the insurer cannot exclude payment for treating a particular illness, as sometimes happens now. For example, if a child has asthma, the insurance company cannot write a policy that excludes that condition from coverage. The new safeguard will be in place later this year.

Full protection for children would not come until 2014, said Kate Cyrul, a spokeswoman for the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, another panel that authored the legislation. That's the same year when insurance companies could no longer deny coverage to any person on account of health problems.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jYnajhWrPEXihcCrpRNfUKN7rN-AD9EKTKIG0

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »