Posted by
Defend America on Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:35:49 AM
March 25, 2010 4:00 A.M.
So, You Still Want to Close Gitmo?
Judge’s order to release 9/11 jihadist is a sign of things to come.
Mohamedou Slahi is responsible for the murder
of thousands of Americans. He was a core member of the 9/11 conspiracy
— the recruiter of Mohamed Atta and the other ringleaders. If he’d had
his druthers, even more Americans would have been killed: He is almost
certainly the al-Qaeda middle manager who activated the Canadian cell
that attempted to bomb Los Angeles International Airport. On the scale
of war criminals, he edges toward the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed range, as
bad as it gets.
A federal judge has ordered that he be released.
Cassandra did not like being Cassandra. It is not enjoyable to foresee avoidable catastrophes
again and
again (and
again and
again and
again)
only to watch as no remedial measures are taken and disaster strikes.
To repeat: The courts are institutionally incompetent when it comes to
matters of national security, particularly the prosecution of war.
The Framers intended it that way. National-security decisions are the
most important ones a political community makes, so our system of
government was designed to have them made by the political branches —
by those who answer to the voters, to the people whose lives are at
stake. When the political branches abdicate this first responsibility
of government, sitting by as it is usurped by politically insulated
judges, they deny us the freedom to decide for ourselves what our
security requires. We are then the subjects of judges rather than
masters of our own destiny.
The courts, moreover, are the worst
institution to which we could surrender this authority. Not only are we
powerless to vote them out if they get national-defense matters wrong,
they are
guaranteed to get them wrong. This is not
because judges are bad people; it is because they have no
responsibility for protecting the country. They are generally good
people whose job is to ensure that the parties before the court are
given due process. When a judge does that job conscientiously,
due-process rights are inevitably inflated. That judges do not run
completely out of control in maximizing due-process rights owes not to
judicial temperance but to the powers of the political branches.
http://article.nationalreview.com/429202/so-you-still-want-to-close-gitmo/andrew-c-mccarthy